Literal F1

Spain 2012: The Stats

Here are some great stats from an incredible, historic grand prix weekend. I’ll get my full race roundup up including similar interesting notes (such as how Alonso drove all his stints on used tyres) later in the week but simply had to share these stats with you all:

  • The last man to score his maiden podium, pole position and win on the same race weekend? Double world champion Sebastian Vettel at Monza 2008. Maldonado did this in his 24th race, Vettel in his 21st.

  • Maldonado is the 104th winner and 96th driver to get pole position in F1.

  • Venezuela is now the 21st country to have a Grand Prix winning driver.

  • Lewis Hamilton ran a 31 lap stint on the Pirelli tyres, the only driver to have driven more laps (and distance because of longer lenght of circuit) is Perez with 35 laps in Australia 2011. Not bad for a driver who apparently can’t manage his tyres and has an aggressive driving style?

  • The last time Williams, Ferrari and Lotus were on the podium together was for Monaco 1987.

  • To one up the previous stat, the last time Williams, Ferrari and Lotus were on the podium in that order was Dallas GP 1984 with Keke Rosberg, Arnoux and de Angelis.

  • If you add Hamilton’s win at Abu Dhabi and Webber’s at Sao Paulo in 2011, we now have the 7th winner in the 7th consecutive race. The record streak for that is 9,

  • After 5 races in 2011, Vettel had a 41 point lead to Hamilton in 2nd, that same lead covers the top 10 in 2012

  • Red Bull have finished all but 1 lap so far this year, highest for a team. One lap less because Webber was lapped this race.

  • Fernando Alonso remarked saying how unpredictable the racing is this year: “We finished 60s behind the Red Bull of Vettel in Bahrain and today we lapped Webber’.

  • After a quarter of the season over, Alonso has 3100% more points than Massa. Massa has 2 whilst Alonso joint leads the championship with Vettel on 61 points.

  • For this first time Red Bull racing have had to perform front nose changes on both their cars.

  • Schumacher’s season seems to be following a pattern, his results so far are: DNF. 10th. DNF. 10th. DNF.

  • This is William’s 114th victory, Maldonado their 15th different winner.

  • William’s last win was with Juan Pablo Montoya at Brazil 2004, 130 races apart. The podium then was also shared by Kimi Raikkonen and a Ferrari (Barichello instead of Alonso).

Hamilton: From First To Last

The FIA ruled to penalise Hamilton today after the qualifying session thus excluding his pole position and making him start P24 (last) in the race tomorrow. Understandably, this ruling has attracted quite a bit of opinion and views fuelled from an emotive context from fans seeing their driver go literally from first to last after what he described was his “best pole ever”.

Before presenting my own opinion on the matter I feel it’s paramount to first examine the full facts and rules upon which the decision is made to not jump to conclusions.

The Rules & Facts

First, here’s the official ruling from the stewards (click for official PDF):

“The stewards received a report from the race director which stated that during post-qualifying scrutineering a sample of fuel was required from car four, however, the car failed to return to the pits under its own power as required under Article 6.6.2 of the FIA Formula One Technical Regulations.

“The stewards heard from the team representative Mr Sam Michael who stated that the car stopped on the circuit for reasons of force majeure. A team member had put an insufficient quantity of fuel into the car thereby resulting in the car having to be stopped on the circuit in order to be able to provide the required amount for sampling purposes.

“As the amount of fuel put into the car is under the complete control of the competitor the stewards cannot accept this as a case of force majeure.

“The stewards determine that this is a breach of Article 6.6.2 of the FIA Formula One Technical Regulations and the competitor is accordingly excluded from the results of the qualifying session. The competitor is however allowed to start the race from the back of the grid.”

Now let’s examine this Article 6.6.2 which McLaren infringed upon:

“Competitors must ensure that a one litre sample of fuel may be taken from the car at any time during the event. “Except in cases of force majeure (accepted as such by the stewards of the meeting), if a sample of fuel is required after a practice session the car concerned must have first been driven back to the pits under its own power.”

Note this article was put into place because of a pretty much mirror incident that occurred in Canada 2010 with Lewis Hamilton. He qualified on pole (only McLaren pole in 2010) in an intense qualifying session to later stop the car half way around the track because of lack of fuel. The other teams contested this (because the difference in fuel could have potentially made a difference in that session) and thus this article was brought into place.

What Actually Happened?

BBC’s Gary Anderson sheds light into what actually happened and make McLaren make this crucial, vital mistake.

“The fuel rig guy put the rig on, but he had the handle set to drain fuel. He discovered his mistake and switched it to put fuel in the car. But as a result he didn’t put as much fuel in it as he should have. You have to be able to drive back to the pit-lane and have one litre of fuel left for the FIA to test. He went across the start-finish line 20 seconds before the chequered flag but if they had sat in the garage for three or four more seconds to get more fuel in, they still would have had time to cross the line and complete another flying lap. Sometimes I don’t think McLaren think on their feet.”

Personal Opinion

Did McLaren underfuel/cheat to go faster in qualifying?

NO!! Absolutely not. As revealed above by Gary Anderson this was a genuine mistake from McLaren owing to a fuel rig problem.

Even if you account for the maximum of 3 tenths the weight of a full, fast lap of fuel accounts for, Hamilton still had the pole by quarter of a second. Hamilton as a driver fully deserved that pole.

Why wasn’t Vettel/Rosberg/Massa punished when he parked the car after the race in Bahrain?

Thats because the rule (Article 6.2.2) states that it only applies to “practice sessions”. Confusingly, the qualifying session is officially referred to as “qualifying practice”. So as it stands in every session apart from the race you need to get back to the pits under your own power & give that 1L fuel sample.

Is the FIA’s decision’s wrong/biased/unjust?

This is the question and sentiment I’m finding the most on social media right now. In a word: No.

Whilst you could argue it is harsh to exclude him to qualifying hence take away that spectacular pole position (McLaren’s 150th pole position) from him, it is completely under the rules. In fact, it’s worth stating that the FIA stewards had the power to disqualify him from the race all together but have chosen not to.

It’s the duty of the stewards and FIA to police and implement the technical regulations that have been set in place. By penalising hamilton they are simply adhering to the guidelines and doing their job.

In terms of accountability, this was a mistake from McLaren and mistakes happen. Lewis Hamilton himself was in no way responsible for this and whilst it is a massive shame for him to undergo the penalty for the team’s mistake but that is the way it is in F1. You drive for, celebrate victories and rue penalties with the team.

Vettel Imitating Alonso’s Accent

The BBC’s Andrew Benson asked Fernando Alonso a question regarding how he felt about Rosberg’s defensive driving in Bahrain. Vettel answered, in Alonso’s accent, using the words Alonso used on team radio shortly after the incident “You always have to leave space”. [YouTube link to Alonso's team radio]

Alonso replied back “Yes, (you have to leave space) like I did for you in Monza” referring to the way Vettel overtook Alonso around the outside of Curva Grande [Youtube Link] last year.

This had me laughing a lot, both these men are professional sportsmen and great drivers, both double world champions in an intensely contested sport. Yet they still have great mutual respect and good, funny banter among each other.

Words don’t do it justice so I just had to share it with you all.

McLaren’s Flat Nose

McLaren ran with a new, higher and flatter nose in the Mugello test which is a departure from the low nose they’ve been running for the last few years. McLaren differentiated themselves this year as the only team whose car’s front end had not been smashed by The Hulk or Thor (The Avenger’s references) to create an ungainly bump/step. They’ve raised the nose now but thankfully kept that bump/step/beak away. I usually don’t comment on very technical matters since they’re are people out there who do a far more comprehensive and detailed job on it. Here’s a couple of great articles:

“McLaren Front End Aero Development” from ScarbsF1 – it chronologically goes through and explains McLaren’s car philosophy complete with his usual, great drawings.

“McLaren’s MP4-27 New Nose” from SomersF1 – nicely explains the reasoning behind the nose, which I shall also be covering below. Thanks to him as well for the picture I’m using on this post.

However, just today two of my F1 savvy friends just today asked me: “Why have McLaren gotten a new nose?” to explain the reasoning behind the change. Since this change is an obvious, conspicuous visual one I believe it’ll garner considerable fan interest. So here’s a simple bullet points list as a quick read that’ll give you a basic overview of the technical development and answer that question.

  • The front wing is the most important aerodynamic aspect of the car. It’s the first thing that hits the air to both work and crucially, channel it to produce downforce.

  • The channeling of air is the important bit. The front wing is tweaked such as maximum air is sent to areas where downforce can most be produced (rear bodywork) and away from areas where it can’t (tyres).

  • With a higher nose (trend started in 2009 by the Red Bull RB5), you can channel more air underneath the front wing. More air means more potential to generate downforce.

  • McLaren until now that a unique “snow plough” system that generated front downforce in concordance with their low nose philosophy. If you look as back as 2010 you’ll see McLaren having the lowest front nose in the paddock.

  • This year teams lost a lot of rear downforce produced by the exhaust blown diffuser. If you lose rear downforce, in the most basic sense, you’ll have to reduce front downforce to keep the car balanced. The snow plough is no longer necessary to generate front downforce so McLaren have now gotten rid of it.

So I don’t expect this change to bring a sudden massive increase or decrease in performance from the MP4-27. They’ve altered the basic car design philosophy behind it to get more air underneath the front wing that they work on. It opens up developmental avenues for them to exploit later on.

One small note aesthetically, thankfully, there isn’t an ugly bump on the car but wow that’s a flat platypus like shape of carbon fibre.

Gilles Villeneuve

Joseph Gilles Henri Villeneuve, better known as Gilles Villeneuve as a true master of speed. Today marks thirty years since he passed away in a fatal crash on track. Thanks to the Senna movie, most F1 fans are now aware of his brilliance and exploits but many (especially those of my generation, born more than a decade after his death) are unaware of the brilliance of Villeneuve.

Here are two stories of his exploits, my personal favourites to explain why he is so revered amongst arden racing fans.

1. Eleven Seconds

Read that again, Eleven Seconds. Not tenths, seconds . That’s by how much Gilles out-qualified his team mate, in the same car. Who was this team mate? A rookie? A novice? A slouch? No, his team mate was Jody Schekter, that year’s world champion.

Jody finished second in the practice session for the 1979 US GP, thinking he’d done a great job only to look at the timing screen and then say this:

“I scared myself rigid that day. I thought I had to be quickest. Then I saw Gilles’s time and — I still don’t really understand how it was possible. Eleven seconds!”

2. Tactical Brilliance

This was the last win of Gilles Villeneuve’s career and in my view, his best. Ferrari has adopted a turbo engine that was immensely powerful but the car lacked downforce and handling to be fast around corners. Gilles qualified 7th, had a lightening start and somehow through a mix of tactics and speed taken the lead. The cars behind were significantly faster but being faster is never enough: you need to overtake.

What followed was a master class in clean, defensive driving. He would position the car right at the apex of corners and in the middle of the track in the corners he was slower, so others couldn’t overtake him. What I found especially brilliant was that we would actually deliberately drive slower in the corners to bunch up the cars behind up and prevent them from making a move. It’s easier to overtake when you have a higher corner speed because the differential is higher. Downforce increases with speed and Gilles negated the downforce deficit his car had by forcing the cars behind to drive slower! He would then pull away from the cars using hi Ferrari’s turbo boosted engine and great top speed at the pit straight.

He did this for 60 laps and won the race. Five cars had bunched behind (watch the video to see the effect) and in the end the cars were separated by just 1.24 seconds, one of the closest finishes in F1 history.

Hope these two exploits gave you a glimpse into the brilliance of the man. WTF1 has nicely covered his top 10 exploits (including my personal two) so I’d recommend giving that a read if you want to know more.

RIP Gilles Villeneuve. 19.01.1950 – 08.05.82

☯ Sporting Injuries

Fernando Alonso recently did a candid Twitter/Facebook Q&A session with his fans and gave some very interesting and revealing answers. One particularly caught my eye:

Q: (luigimaranello) All athletes have injuries. Have you ever driven being injured? What injuries?

A: Yes, sometimes. Sometimes you have muscular injuries, like a micro tear caused in training, tendinitis, a neck strain as a result of fatigue… But it’s just like in any other sport. I think the time I suffered most was at the beginning of last season, when I was suffering from an injury to the sciatic nerve which caused me a lot of pain to the leg towards the end of races. I also had a fever in a couple of races: at the end of the race I felt as if I was at the very limit of my strengths.

Click the quote to read the whole interview. It’s a good read that I’ll recommend because it does show a more human side of him.

The Sciatic nerve is the largest & one of the most important functionally in the human body. It innervates the whole lower limb, starting from the lower back right down to the foot. Those of who have unfortunately have experienced Sciatica (medical term for sciatic nerve pain) will instantly sympathise with Alonso. The injury causes sporadic intense shooting pains down the leg, heightened with movement against forces (such as raising the leg up against gravity). For a Formula One driver, precise throttle control and braking at 4-5G forces is absolutely vital so I would consider this as a serious injury in the terms of discomfort it causes. In the enclosed cockpit of a F1 car, where the legs are static for long periods of time, the pain can progressively build up which is why Alonso says the end of races were particularly tough. Big kudos and respect to him for driving 56 laps of Malaysia in that heat and discomfort.

Formula One drivers and in fact, sportsmen are known for not revealing their injuries. Most recently, Mark Webber revealed in his book in 2011 that he sustained a small chip fracture of the shoulder going cycling between Singapore and Japan 2010. He said it did not cause him “enough discomfort” to notify the team or even Christian Horner as he felt it wouldn’t affect his performance.

read more

Webber to Ferrari 2013

Solid reasoning from James Allen why Webber would be ideal for Ferrari:

There has been contact in the past between the two and Webber has been on Ferrari’s radar for a number of reasons; he gets on well with Fernando Alonso and is liked by Stefano Domenicali and others, he’s uncomplicated and he’s fast. He also has a lot of experience and solid engineering understanding, both of which Ferrari prize…. But as a keen student of the sport’s history, he may feel that with one or two years of his career left, a stint at Ferrari would add a prestigious cap to his career.

Click the quote to read the full article on the author’s domain.

If you think about it, Mark Webber is the ideal “not bad for a number two driver”. He’s consistant, fast and will push the team forward whilst collecting big championship points.

This certainly gives him great negotiation leverage with his talks with Red Bull. He knows Red Bull certainly need his services next year. None of the ‘Red Bull Young Drivers’ I believe are ready to challenge Vettel & handling the pressure that comes with a championship winning capable car.

For the reasons mentioned in the article, Ferrari would love to have him for at least a year, until Perez matures but perhaps two years will be a better symbiotic, mutual agreement. Note also that losing Webber will significantly hurt Red Bull in their championship challenge, which would benefit Ferrari should they have a competitive car from the onset next year. Even McLaren with their pairing of Hamilton and Button will be very concerned with Alonso & Webber in a competitive Ferrari.

Also interesting to note, there hasn’t been a ‘NO’ from Webber and crucially, there hasn’t (yet) been a denouncing ‘NO’ from Ferrari like there usually is following these silly season rumours.

RIP Ayrton Senna

This is the wallpaper I’ve had on my computer, iPad and iPhone today and I thought I’d share it you, my readers.

21.03.1960 – 01.05.1994.

The greatest racing driver who defined a generation.

As William’s put it today morning on twitter, always remembered.

For those who’d like their memories refreshed, here is the master at work.

Chelsea “Out of The Blue”

Sauber have announced an “innovative” new sponsorship idea that ties with Chelsea FC.

Both parties have had boosting, inspired results recently, Sauber in Malaysia & Chelsea against Barcelona.

James Allen lists the possible reasoning for such an agreement:

With a shared platform across two of the biggest TV sports in the world, they can offer a joint sponsorship deal to a global brand looking for exposure in both areas. This is something Tony Fernandes has been hoping to achieve by owning both the Caterham and Queens Park Rangers teams.

It’s certainly an interesting idea because of much wider reach it gives the teams. This gives them an avenue to bargain with to extract more money from current or upcoming sponsors. It’s a great deal for Sauber, who clearly have a good car this season so will be attracting potential sponsors with their good result. Their plan would be to utilise this “innovative, unique” linkup as a perk to sell greater value to these sponsors to gain more funds.

“Racing” Tyres

Any form of motorsport runs on tyres that are termed “racing tyres”. They could be more different from the ones you put on your road car; they are custom made, design and worked on specifically for the demands and needs of the particular category of racing, to which Formula One is no different. However in recent days a bit of a debate is developing whether the 2012 Pirelli P Zero tyres are indeed “racing tyres” or whether they are “please-manage-me tyres”.

Following the series of events, the first comment was made on this regard by Martin Brundle on the Sky post qualifying show. He later wrote about this feeling on the Sky Sports website:

You can click any of the quoted text in this article to read the entire article on the website it was sourced from

In eight days we have had two great races largely driven by the degradation and resultant strategy dilemmas around the Pirelli tyres. In our show I expressed an opinion that whilst I’m really enjoying the races I wouldn’t want F1 to become only about the tyres. I hadn’t realised that Michael Schumacher was about to launch a broadside at the difficulty of managing the narrow window of performance and the high drop off of the tyre grip. On the journey home I was talking with two F1 drivers, a world champion and a multiple race winner, and they had very similar concerns to Michael in that they can’t push the cars anywhere near their limits. ‘Physically my granny could drive the race’ quipped one to underline how far away from the limits they are.

Here’s what Schumacher actually said: read more

Older Posts »