Hamilton: From First To Last

Hamilton: From First To Last

The FIA ruled to penalise Hamilton today after the qualifying session thus excluding his pole position and making him start P24 (last) in the race tomorrow. Understandably, this ruling has attracted quite a bit of opinion and views fuelled from an emotive context from fans seeing their driver go literally from first to last after what he described was his “best pole ever”.

Before presenting my own opinion on the matter I feel it’s paramount to first examine the full facts and rules upon which the decision is made to not jump to conclusions.

The Rules & Facts

First, here’s the official ruling from the stewards (click for official PDF):

“The stewards received a report from the race director which stated that during post-qualifying scrutineering a sample of fuel was required from car four, however, the car failed to return to the pits under its own power as required under Article 6.6.2 of the FIA Formula One Technical Regulations.

“The stewards heard from the team representative Mr Sam Michael who stated that the car stopped on the circuit for reasons of force majeure. A team member had put an insufficient quantity of fuel into the car thereby resulting in the car having to be stopped on the circuit in order to be able to provide the required amount for sampling purposes.

“As the amount of fuel put into the car is under the complete control of the competitor the stewards cannot accept this as a case of force majeure.

“The stewards determine that this is a breach of Article 6.6.2 of the FIA Formula One Technical Regulations and the competitor is accordingly excluded from the results of the qualifying session. The competitor is however allowed to start the race from the back of the grid.”

Now let’s examine this Article 6.6.2 which McLaren infringed upon:

“Competitors must ensure that a one litre sample of fuel may be taken from the car at any time during the event. “Except in cases of force majeure (accepted as such by the stewards of the meeting), if a sample of fuel is required after a practice session the car concerned must have first been driven back to the pits under its own power.”

Note this article was put into place because of a pretty much mirror incident that occurred in Canada 2010 with Lewis Hamilton. He qualified on pole (only McLaren pole in 2010) in an intense qualifying session to later stop the car half way around the track because of lack of fuel. The other teams contested this (because the difference in fuel could have potentially made a difference in that session) and thus this article was brought into place.

What Actually Happened?

BBC’s Gary Anderson sheds light into what actually happened and make McLaren make this crucial, vital mistake.

“The fuel rig guy put the rig on, but he had the handle set to drain fuel. He discovered his mistake and switched it to put fuel in the car. But as a result he didn’t put as much fuel in it as he should have. You have to be able to drive back to the pit-lane and have one litre of fuel left for the FIA to test. He went across the start-finish line 20 seconds before the chequered flag but if they had sat in the garage for three or four more seconds to get more fuel in, they still would have had time to cross the line and complete another flying lap. Sometimes I don’t think McLaren think on their feet.”

Personal Opinion

Did McLaren underfuel/cheat to go faster in qualifying?

NO!! Absolutely not. As revealed above by Gary Anderson this was a genuine mistake from McLaren owing to a fuel rig problem.

Even if you account for the maximum of 3 tenths the weight of a full, fast lap of fuel accounts for, Hamilton still had the pole by quarter of a second. Hamilton as a driver fully deserved that pole.

Why wasn’t Vettel/Rosberg/Massa punished when he parked the car after the race in Bahrain?

Thats because the rule (Article 6.2.2) states that it only applies to “practice sessions”. Confusingly, the qualifying session is officially referred to as “qualifying practice”. So as it stands in every session apart from the race you need to get back to the pits under your own power & give that 1L fuel sample.

Is the FIA’s decision’s wrong/biased/unjust?

This is the question and sentiment I’m finding the most on social media right now. In a word: No.

Whilst you could argue it is harsh to exclude him to qualifying hence take away that spectacular pole position (McLaren’s 150th pole position) from him, it is completely under the rules. In fact, it’s worth stating that the FIA stewards had the power to disqualify him from the race all together but have chosen not to.

It’s the duty of the stewards and FIA to police and implement the technical regulations that have been set in place. By penalising hamilton they are simply adhering to the guidelines and doing their job.

In terms of accountability, this was a mistake from McLaren and mistakes happen. Lewis Hamilton himself was in no way responsible for this and whilst it is a massive shame for him to undergo the penalty for the team’s mistake but that is the way it is in F1. You drive for, celebrate victories and rue penalties with the team.

Incoming search terms:

  • article 6 6 2
  • f1 last to first
  • Kurt

    Nope sorry its too harsh. Mclaren made a mistake and tried to adhere to the rules about supplying fuel – basically if the Stewards thought they were cheating then why not exclude them from the race completely? If they accept it was a mistake exclude from Q3.

    • http://twitter.com/LiteralF1 Literal F1

      I agree it’s harsh and you could even view it as too harsh since they could have just excluded them from Q3. But I think (certainly not sure) comes to rulings it doesn’t work like that and you can’t differentiate between qualifying sessions. So it’s either exclusion from all of qualifying or no penalty at all.

  • Nicola_marie1975

    So why was Vettel not stripped of his win when he didn’t have enough fuel in the car to return to the pits, or Rosberg?

    • http://twitter.com/TalkingaboutF1 Graham Keilloh

      Read the rule: it explicitly refers to getting back to the pits in a ‘practice session’ (which includes qualifying). In other words, it doesn’t cover the race.

  • Peter-james

    Nothing wrong with the rules, they are clear and concise!  But what on earth are McLaren up to? Is it possible the fuel rig technician was told he had to set the handle device to drain fuel in order to make the car lighter for the flying last lap? Whatever the reasons were, I sure Hamilton is furious with this and McLaren, I would be for sure!! The sport has always had its politics and all these new FIA rules will only store more hatred by its fans for this sport.

    Many fans have withdrawn their support of the sport after the BBC budget cuts and this kind of ruling implementation will not help further.

  • Rid.W

    Rules are rules can’t have a goat stewards for enforcing them, Mcalren have made alot of mistakes so far this season, first the Pitstops of the past two races now this you’ve got to feel for Button and Hamilton

  • Craig

    Technically absolutely, but there has just been a big conflab on some different rules where Steards stressed that they should be able t exercise discretion.

    Where better to demonstrate this discretion, 5 place grid penalty, 0.3 seconds onto his lap time, a second onto his lap time, but come on, the back of the grid !!!!

  • saltireF1


    blockquote>Did McLaren underfuel/cheat to go faster in qualifying?

    NO!! Absolutely not. As revealed above by Gary Anderson this was a genuine mistake from McLaren owing to a fuel rig problem.



    Who knows, only McLaren do, it wasn’t a fuel rig problem but an operator problem as noted from the quote by Gary Anderson in the main article. Whilst the reason given by McLaren may be true, it wouldn’t be the first time that they have shall we say “misled the stewards” and that may have lead them to look just at the facts and not believe the mitigating factors.

    Whilst I fully expect to get some stick for saying the above I do believe that the penalty was far too harsh. I think Lewis did deserve some sort of penalty, perhaps loss of fastest time in Q3 would have been appropriate but it’s the team who should have felt the stewards wrath, perhaps with a big fine., not the driver.

  • Jmorris5

    Ferrari International Assistance strike again.

  • W54vyw4

    Hamilton started his career as a cheater. He still is…